Conversation

🧩 A math puzzle. 🚗 A solar car. 🌪️ Natural-disaster insurance. ⚡ Electricity oversupply in Kyushu.

These were four very different questions put to ClimateGPT 4.3, a specialized climate model, during a recent Internet Archive tour. The results were a mix of useful answers, wrong turns & outright refusals.

📖 Learn more about the experiment ➡️ https://erasmus.ai/?p=875

9
0
0

@internetarchive good lord. we already have the answer to all the climate questions (quit burning fossil fuel) and it does not involve asking a fucking genAI

0
1
0

@internetarchive
What the fuck is wrong with you?!

Let’s give the kids some time with the brain rotting machine. What next let’s give the kids some time with the elephant’s foot in Chernobyl?

0
1
0

@internetarchive like seriously, what am I supposed to feel here, IA?

you exposed a bunch of kids to a technology that leads to cognitive surrender

it gave them a bunch of fucking useless answers

training it fucked over a bunch of poor people and had a severe environmental cost

the fuck am I supposed to be feeling?

1
0
0

@internetarchive oh how cool you lazily fed a bunch of climate data someone else came up with to llama, a non-open “open weight” model whose training, again, fucked over a bunch of poor people and did a bunch of environmental damage. and the results from doing this were really fucking bad.

and just this in, of course it’s also a fucking cryptocurrency scam: https://www.eci.io/about what in the fuck is wrong with you

1
0
0

@zzt @internetarchive FFS when are we going to get NAMES?

Who are the SPECIFIC PEOPLE in IA, EFF, etc. telling the people working for them to do fashy shit?

And why are the fucking cowards going along with it rather than whistleblowing all the shit from their bosses?

0
0
1

@internetarchive Hopping into bed with a technology pushed by the people who have spent the past two decades making the internet near impossible to archive, first through the Web3 push to paywall off the commons, then the abusive scraping that killed many small sites and caused others to hide their content behind defensive walls.

Then there's the goddamned gall to promote a CLIMATE themed LLM as the infrastructure needed to train and maintain these things adds multiple small Western nations worth of usage to an already strained planet. Chunks of the world were literally on fire this year, did that just pass you by?

0
1
0

@internetarchive and here we find the other reason i don’t trust the internet archive

(other than the fact that things i care very much about that used to be in the wayback machine, now are not)

0
1
1

@internetarchive I just applied for a job with the IA. If that job is going to involve any contact with the planet-cooking plagiarism machines, please withdraw my application.

0
1
0

@internetarchive a climate-destroying service themed around preventing further climate destruction?

how ironic.

0
0
0
@internetarchive 1M GO1NG TO CUT YOUR THRO4T 4ND L1ST3N TO YOU BL33D WH1L3 1 SM3LL YOU D13
0
0
0
@internetarchive Did you even read the blog you 247 commenters? Or you did not understood it well or you've decided the cure for AI scraping is to delete the historical record.
You're not "protecting your content from AI." You're erasing history..
Blocking ia_archiverbot doesn't stop AI companies. They'll find other sources. But the public record? Gone.
You're collateral damage to your own cause. The Internet Archive isn't an AI company. It's a nonprofit that's preserved the web for ~30 years. You're not fighting AI. You're fighting a library.
~40% of websites vanish after 10 years. Without the Archive, your "content" won't be protected from AI > > > it'll just be gone.
1
0
0
@internetarchive realised it wasn't showing up as a reply on your instance the way i did it so i'll say it again.
delete this.
0
0
0